﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>documenti scientifici Archivi - Happy Care</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.happycare.it/category/documenti-scientifici/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.happycare.it/category/documenti-scientifici/</link>
	<description>Prodotti elettromedicali per animali</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2018 16:07:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>it-IT</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Studio sul dolore post-operatorio dopo ovariectomia</title>
		<link>https://www.happycare.it/studio-sul-dolore-post-operatorio-dopo-ovariectomia/</link>
					<comments>https://www.happycare.it/studio-sul-dolore-post-operatorio-dopo-ovariectomia/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staff Happy Care]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2018 09:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[documenti scientifici]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.happycare.it/?p=2891</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Studio sul dolore post-operatorio dopo ovariectomia Heidi L Sha¡ord DVM, Peter W Hellyer DVM, MS, Dipl ACVA, Kenneth T Crump CVT, Ann E Wagner DVM, MS,<span class="excerpt-hellip"> […]</span></p>
<p>L'articolo <a href="https://www.happycare.it/studio-sul-dolore-post-operatorio-dopo-ovariectomia/">Studio sul dolore post-operatorio dopo ovariectomia</a> proviene da <a href="https://www.happycare.it">Happy Care</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Studio sul dolore post-operatorio dopo ovariectomia</h2>
<h6>Heidi L Sha¡ord DVM, Peter W Hellyer DVM, MS, Dipl ACVA, Kenneth T Crump CVT, Ann E Wagner DVM, MS, Dipl ACVA, Khursheed R Mama DVM, MS, Dipl ACVA &amp; James S Gaynor DVM, MS, Dipl ACVA<br />
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State Uni-versity, Fort Collins, USA</h6>
<div style="border-bottom: 1px solid #020202;"></div>
<h5>Uso della magnetoterapia per il trattamento post-operatorio nei cani: uno studio pilota.</h5>
<h5><i>Abstract</i></h5>
<p>L’obiettivo era determinare se la magnetoterapia riduceva il dolore post operatorio in cani dopo l’ovariectomia e determinare l’interazione della magnetoterapia con l’analgesia da morfina post-operatoria.</p>
<h5>Introduzione</h5>
<p>L’interesse nell’uso terapeutico della magnetoterapia è cresciuto negli ultimi anni da quando la magnetoterapia ha guadagnato in USA l’approvazione da parte dell’ente “Food and Drug Administration” per la terapia di pazienti umani con fratture scom-poste e pseudoartrosi congenite (Basset 1993).</p>
<p>L’uso della magnetoterapia è stato incorporato nel trattamento delle tendiniti sia negli umani (Binder et al. 1984) che nei cavalli (Auer et al.1983). Inoltre, è stato dimostrato che la magnetoterapia migliora la guarigione delle ferite nel cane. Il sollievo dal dolore cronico è stato un problema comune associato al trattamento con magnetoterapia nei pazienti umani (Binder et al.1984; Ellis 1993,Trock et al.1994)<br />
Nessuno studio ha studiato il sollievo dal dolore mediato dalla magnetoterapia negli animali. L&#8217;obiettivo di questo studio pilota era di ottenere informazioni preliminari per valutare gli effetti analgesici della magnetoterapia nei cani.<br />
In particolare, abbiamo analizzato la capacità di una magnetoterapia terapeutica di controllare il dolore post-operatorio e valutato la sua interazione con l&#8217;analgesia della morfina post-operatoria nei cani sottoposti a ovarioisterectomia di routine.</p>
<p>Sedici cagne intatte non gravide ,di peso corporeo di 18 Kg (10 -32 di media) e 13 mesi (3 &#8211; 36 mesi di media) sono stati i soggetti di questo studio pilota.</p>
<p>Sono stati presentati all&#8217;Ospedale Veterinario della Colorado State University dalla Larimer County Humane Society per ovarioisterectomia elettiva.<br />
Il Comitato per la cura degli animali della Colorado State University ha approvato l&#8217;uso dei cani per gli studi.</p>
<p>Tutti i cani sono stati verificati in buona salute sulla base di esami fisici e concentra-zione totale delle proteine plasmatiche determinata il giorno prima dell&#8217;intervento chirurgico.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h5>Trattamento elettromagnetico ad impulsi</h5>
<p>L&#8217;unità magnetica è stata fissata all&#8217;esterno della gabbia e il campo magnetico è stato misurato utilizzando un gaussometro a tre vie e controllato per essere all&#8217;interno della gabbia.<br />
L&#8217;unità magnetica ha emesso un campo elettromagnetico pulsato a 0,5 Hz per periodi alternati di 20 minuti e poi per 20 minuti spento per il periodo di recupero di 6 ore.<br />
La configurazione dell’unità elettromagnetica pulsata è stata raccomandata dal produttore per il sollievo dal dolore negli animali (Peppin 1998).<br />
Durante il periodo di recupero, i cani in morfina sono stati esposti a un&#8217;unità elettromagnetica non funzionale, benché visibilmente identica.</p>
<h5>Valutazione del dolore</h5>
<p>Sono stati valutati nove criteri differenti di risposta comportamentale e fisiologica al dolore per determinare il punteggio del dolore cumulativo.<br />
Il criterio include il comfort, movimento, aspetto, comportamento non provocato, comportamento interattivo, vocalizzazione, frequenza cardiaca, frequenza respiratoria e pressione media arteriosa.</p>
<p>I cani sono stati osservati per circa 10 minuti al giorno in un momento preciso.<br />
Qualsiasi cane che esibiva un eccesso di dolore, definito come un punteggio di dolore cumulativo di più di 17, è stato somministrato immediatamente morfina (0,5 mg kg 1, IV) e rimosso dallo studio.</p>
<h5>Discussione</h5>
<p>In questo studio pilota, abbiamo scoperto che la magnetoterapia ha contribuito all&#8217;analgesia post-operatoria nei cani sottoposti a ovarioisterectomia elettiva.<br />
La MAP di entrambi i gruppi morfina e morfina / magnete tendeva a ritornare ai valori basali di T 1/4 300, mentre quella dei gruppi di controllo e dei magneti tendeva ad aumentare. Sammarco et al. (1996) hanno riportato una tendenza simile alla MAP postoperatoria che aumenta nel tempo in un gruppo di controllo di cani. Sebbene l&#8217;analgesia e la sedazione della morfina fossero diminuite di T 1/4 300, i cani trattati con morfina potrebbero aver sperimentato maggiore analgesia e sedazione e ridotto rilascio di catecolamina endogena nel corso dello studio, il che avrebbe potuto contribuire a ridurre la MAP rispetto ai cani non ricevendo la morfina.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2>Use of a pulsed electromagnetic field for treatment of post-operative pain in dogs: a pilot study</h2>
<h6>Heidi L Sha¡ord DVM, Peter W Hellyer DVM, MS, Dipl ACVA, Kenneth T Crump CVT, Ann E Wagner DVM,<br />
MS, Dipl ACVA, Khursheed RM ama DVM, MS, Dipl ACVA &amp; James S Gaynor DVM, MS, Dipl ACVA<br />
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University,<br />
Fort Collins, USA<br />
(<b>Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia, 2002, 29, 43^48</b>)</h6>
<h6>Correspondence: Peter Hellyer, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences,<br />
Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.</h6>
<div style="border-bottom: 1px solid #020202;"></div>
<h5><i>Abstract</i></h5>
<p><b>Objective</b> To determine if pulsed electromagnetic<br />
¢eld (PEMF) therapy reduces post-operative pain in<br />
dogs following ovariohysterectomy, and to evaluate<br />
PEMF interaction with post-operative morphine<br />
analgesia.</p>
<p><b>Study design</b> Randomized controlled clinical trail.</p>
<p><b>Animals</b> Sixteen healthy dogs weighing 18 (10^32)<br />
kg [median (range)] and aged13 (3^36) months.</p>
<p><b>Materials and methods</b> Anesthesia consisted of<br />
atropine (0.04 mg kg1, SC), acepromazine (0.02 mg<br />
kg1, SC), fentanyl (00.1mg kg1, SC), thiopental<br />
(10^15 mg kg1, IV) and halothane in oxygen. Ovariohysterectomies<br />
were performed by senior veterinary<br />
students. Pain score (numeric rating scale,<br />
0^28), pulse rate, respiratory rate, indirect mean<br />
arterial pressure (MAP), and body temperature were<br />
evaluated prior to anesthetic premedication, at extubation,<br />
30m inutes after extubation, and then hourly<br />
for 6 hours. Following extubation, dogs were randomly<br />
divided into four groups: a control group that<br />
received 0.9%NaCl, IV, and no PEMF; a magnet group<br />
that received 0.9% NaCl, IV, and PEMF; a morphine<br />
group that received morphine 0.25 mg kg1, IV,<br />
and no PEMF; and, a magnet/morphine group that<br />
received morphine 0.25 mg kg1, IV, and PEMF. A<br />
single observer, blinded to treatment, obtained all<br />
behavioral observations and physiologic data. Data<br />
were analyzed using the Kruskal^Wallis statistical<br />
test with a signi¢cance of p &lt; 0.05.</p>
<p><b>Results</b> Signi¢cant di¡erences in MAP (mm Hg)<br />
[median (range)] occurred at 300 minutes [morphine<br />
108 (83^114) and magnet/morphine 90<br />
(83^97) [magnet/morphine 93 (81^100) &lt; control 127<br />
(111^129) and magnet 126 (111^129)]. At 30m inutes<br />
the total pain score for the magnet/morphine<br />
group [1.5 (0^5)] was signi¢cantly less than control<br />
[8 (6^13)], but not di¡erent from magnet [5.5 (4^7)]<br />
ormorphine [4.5 (2^9)].</p>
<p><b>Conclusions</b> and clinical relevance Although no<br />
clear bene¢t was seen in this study, the results<br />
suggest that PEMF may augment morphine analgesia<br />
following ovariohysterectomy in dogs, and<br />
that further study of the analgesic e¡ects of PEMF is<br />
warranted.</p>
<p><b>Keywords</b> analgesia, pulsed electromagnetic ¢eld.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h5>Introduction</h5>
<p>Interest in the therapeutic use of electromagnetic<br />
¢elds has grown over the past two decades since<br />
pulsed electromagnetic ¢eld (PEMF) therapy gained<br />
Food and Drug Administration (USA) approval for<br />
the treatment of humanpatientswith nonunion fractures<br />
and congenital pseudoarthrosis (Bassett1993).<br />
Use of PEMF has been incorporated into the treatment<br />
of tendinitis in both humans (Binder et al.<br />
1984) and horses (Auer et al.1983). In addition, PEMF<br />
has been shown to enhance wound healing in the<br />
dog (Scardino et al. 1998). Relief from chronic pain<br />
has been a common ¢nding associated with PEMF treatment in human patients (Binder et al.1984; Ellis<br />
1993,Trock et al.1994), however, PEMF therapy does<br />
not appear to provide analgesia in acute pain models<br />
(Kavaliers&amp;Ossenkopp1985;Reed et al.1987).No studies<br />
have investigated PEMF-mediated pain relief in<br />
animals. The objective of this pilot study was to<br />
obtain preliminary information evaluating the analgesic<br />
e¡ects of PEMF in dogs. Speci¢cally, we investigated<br />
the ability of a therapeutic PEMF to control<br />
post-operative pain, and evaluated its interaction<br />
with post-operative morphine analgesia in dogs<br />
undergoing routine ovariohysterectomy</p>
<h5>Pulsed electromagnetic ¢eld treatment</h5>
<p>The magnetic ¢eld unitwas attached to the outside of<br />
the cage and the magnetic ¢eld was measured using<br />
a tri¢eld gaussmeter and con¢rmed to be within the<br />
cage. The magnetic ¢eld unit delivered a pulsed electromagnetic<br />
¢eld at 0.5 Hz for alternating periods of<br />
20m inutes on and 20m inutes o¡ for the 6-hour<br />
recovery period. The pulsed electromagnetic ¢eld<br />
con¢guration was recommended by the manufacturer<br />
for relief of pain in animals (Peppin 1998).<br />
Control and morphine dogs were exposed to a nonfunctional,<br />
though visibly identical, electromagnetic<br />
¢eld unit during the recovery period.</p>
<h5>Evaluation of pain</h5>
<p>Nine di¡erent criteria re£ecting behavioral and physiologic<br />
responses to pain were evaluated to determine<br />
the cumulative pain score (Appendix A). Criteria included comfort, movement, appearance,<br />
unprovoked behavior, interactive behavior, vocalization,<br />
heart rate, respiratory rate and mean arterial<br />
pressure. Dogs were observed for approximately<br />
10m inutes at each data collection point. Any dog<br />
exhibiting excessive pain, de¢ned as a cumulative<br />
pain score of 17, was administered morphine<br />
(0.5 mg kg1, IV) immediately, and removed from<br />
further study.</p>
<h5>Discussion</h5>
<p>Inthis pilot study, we found that PEMFcontributed to<br />
post-operative analgesia in dogs undergoing elective<br />
ovariohysterectomy. The MAP of both the morphine<br />
and morphine/magnet groups tended to return<br />
towards baseline values by T ¼ 300, whereas that of<br />
the control and magnet groups tended to increase.<br />
Sammarco et al. (1996) reported a similar trend of<br />
post-operativeMAP increasing over time in a control<br />
group of dogs. Although morphine analgesia and<br />
sedation were expected to have diminished by<br />
T ¼ 300, dogs receiving morphine may have experienced<br />
greater analgesia and sedation, and decreased<br />
endogenous catecholamine release throughout the<br />
study, all of which could have contributed to lower<br />
MAP than dogs not receiving morphine. As found in<br />
a previous study,MAP, heart rate and respiratory rate<br />
did not appear to correlate with behavioral indications<br />
of pain (Conzemius et al.1997). Pain scores for<br />
all groups tended to be greatest at the time of extubation.<br />
Post-anesthetic delirium may have contributed<br />
to high scores at this time. The pain scores of control<br />
dogs tended to be greater than all other groups for<br />
the ¢rst 180m inutes. Lascelles et al. (1997) reported<br />
a similar trend in pain scores of control dogs following<br />
ovariohysterectomy. In this study, the magnet<br />
group tended to have lower pain scores than the control<br />
and morphine groups during the ¢rst 180m inutes<br />
following extubation. It is possible that PEMF<br />
potentiation of morphine analgesia contributed to<br />
the ¢nding that morphine/magnet pain scores were<br />
signi¢cantly less than control at T ¼ 30. Our results<br />
suggest that exposure to a PEMF does not interfere with morphine analgesia, unlike a previous study<br />
which found that exposure to a rotating magnetic<br />
¢eld, not a PEMF, inhibited morphine analgesia in<br />
rats (Kavaliers &amp; Ossenkopp1985).<br />
Ovariohysterectomy has been used by other investigators<br />
as a standardized model of surgical pain<br />
(Lascelles et al. 1997, 1998) and for description of<br />
post-operative behavioral parameters indogs (Hardie<br />
et al. 1997).We used both objective (MAP, HR, RR)<br />
and subjective (behavioral observation) measures to<br />
help determine the severity of post-operative pain.<br />
We tried to minimize observer variability by having<br />
a single person obtain all pain score data. The behavioral<br />
comments o¡er insight into individual animal<br />
responses to treatments and suggest that all dogs in<br />
the control group were uncomfortable. Quantitative<br />
behavioral measurements may have detected<br />
more subtle di¡erences between groups and are<br />
recommended for future studies of PEMF-mediated<br />
analgesia.<br />
PEMF therapy has proven successful in the treatment<br />
of pain associated with chronic tendinitis and<br />
osteoarthritis in people (Binder et al. 1984; Trock<br />
et al. 1994). Results of this pilot study suggest that<br />
PEMF may mediate acute post-surgical pain relief<br />
and that further research on clinical application and<br />
mechanisms of action is warranted.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>L'articolo <a href="https://www.happycare.it/studio-sul-dolore-post-operatorio-dopo-ovariectomia/">Studio sul dolore post-operatorio dopo ovariectomia</a> proviene da <a href="https://www.happycare.it">Happy Care</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.happycare.it/studio-sul-dolore-post-operatorio-dopo-ovariectomia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Valutazione del trattamento con pulsazione elettromagnetica su ferite in guarigione</title>
		<link>https://www.happycare.it/valutazione-del-trattamento-con-pulsazione-elettromagnetica-su-ferite-in-guarigione/</link>
					<comments>https://www.happycare.it/valutazione-del-trattamento-con-pulsazione-elettromagnetica-su-ferite-in-guarigione/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staff Happy Care]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2018 09:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[documenti scientifici]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.happycare.it/?p=2889</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Valutazione del trattamento con pulsazione elettromagnetica su ferite in guarigione, variabili clinico-patologiche e attività del sistema centrale nervoso dei cani. Scardino MS1, Swaim SF, Sartin EA,<span class="excerpt-hellip"> […]</span></p>
<p>L'articolo <a href="https://www.happycare.it/valutazione-del-trattamento-con-pulsazione-elettromagnetica-su-ferite-in-guarigione/">Valutazione del trattamento con pulsazione elettromagnetica su ferite in guarigione</a> proviene da <a href="https://www.happycare.it">Happy Care</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Valutazione del trattamento con pulsazione elettromagnetica su ferite in guarigione, variabili clinico-patologiche e attività del sistema centrale nervoso dei cani.</h2>
<h6>Scardino MS1, Swaim SF, Sartin EA, Steiss JE, Spano JS, Hoffman CE, Coolman SL, Peppin BL.</h6>
<h5>OBIETTIVO</h5>
<p>Attività del CNS dei cani. Valutare gli effetti del trattamento con un campo elettromagnetico pulsato (PEMF).</p>
<h5>ANIMALI:</h5>
<p>12 Beagles femmina adulta</p>
<h5>PROCEDURE:</h5>
<p>Ferite aperte e suturate. I cani sono stati divisi in 2 gruppi. Un gruppo ha ricevuto un trattamento PEMF e 1 gruppo è stato valutato non trattato (controllo). I cani sono stati trattati con PEMF un giorno prima dell&#8217;intervento chirurgico. Le ferite sono state valutate mediante l&#8217;uso di tensiometria, planimetria, imaging di perfusione laser Doppler e esame istologico. Sono state anche valutate le variabili clinopatologiche e i tracciati elettroencefalografici.</p>
<h5>RISULTATI:</h5>
<p>L&#8217;uso del trattamento con PEMF ha portato a un&#8217;epitelizzazione si-gnificativamente maggiore delle ferite aperte 10 e 15 giorni dopo l&#8217;intervento. Cinque giorni dopo l&#8217;intervento, le ferite dei cani di con-trollo avevano un valore negativo per la contrazione della ferita, mentre le ferite trattate con PEMF avevano un valore positivo.<br />
Il trattamento con PEMF non ha causato cambiamenti significativi nei risultati a breve termine planimetrici, perfusione, tensiometrici, istologici, clinicopatologici o elettroencefalografici</p>
<h5>CONCLUSIONI:</h5>
<p>Il trattamento con PEMF ha potenziato l&#8217;epitelizzazione nelle ferite cutanee aperte e fornito indicazioni sulla contrazione precoce senza significative variazioni a breve termine in altre variabili.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h5>ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC DOCUMENT</h5>
<h2>Evaluation of treatment with a pulsed electromagnetic<br />
field on wound healing, clinicopathologic variables,<br />
and central nervous system activity of dogs.</h2>
<h6>Scardino MS1, Swaim SF, Sartin EA, Steiss JE, Spano JS, Hoffman CE, Coolman SL,<br />
Peppin BL.</h6>
<h5><i>Abstract</i></h5>
<h5>OBJECTIVE:</h5>
<p>To evaluate effects of treatment with a pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) on<br />
healing of open and sutured wounds, clinicopathologic variables, and CNS<br />
activity of dogs.</p>
<h5>ANIMALS:</h5>
<p>12 adult female Beagles.</p>
<h5>PROCEDURE:</h5>
<p>Open and sutured wounds were created in the skin of the trunk of the dogs.<br />
Dogs were divided into 2 groups. One group received PEMF treatment and 1<br />
group served as untreated (control) dogs. The PEMF-treated dogs received<br />
treatment twice a day starting the day before surgery and lasting through day 21<br />
after surgery. Wounds were evaluated by use of tensiometry, planimetry, laser<br />
Doppler perfusion imaging, and histologic examination. Clinicopathologic<br />
variables and electroencephalographic tracings were also evaluated.</p>
<h5>RESULTS:</h5>
<p>Use of PEMF treatment resulted in significantly enhanced epithelialization of<br />
open wounds 10 and 15 days after surgery. Five days after surgery, wounds of<br />
control dogs had a negative value for wound contraction, whereas PEMF-treated<br />
wounds had a positive value. The PEMF treatment did not cause significant<br />
changes in short-term planimetric, perfusion, tensiometric, histologic,<br />
clinicopathologic, or electroencephalographic results.</p>
<h5>CONCLUSIONS:</h5>
<p>The PEMF treatment enhanced wound epithelialization in open cutaneous<br />
wounds and provided indications of early contraction without significant shortterm<br />
changes in other variables.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>L'articolo <a href="https://www.happycare.it/valutazione-del-trattamento-con-pulsazione-elettromagnetica-su-ferite-in-guarigione/">Valutazione del trattamento con pulsazione elettromagnetica su ferite in guarigione</a> proviene da <a href="https://www.happycare.it">Happy Care</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.happycare.it/valutazione-del-trattamento-con-pulsazione-elettromagnetica-su-ferite-in-guarigione/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Effetto della terapia a campi elettromagnetici pulsati sul volume della prostata</title>
		<link>https://www.happycare.it/effetto-della-terapia-a-campi-elettromagnetici-pulsati-sul-volume-della-prostata/</link>
					<comments>https://www.happycare.it/effetto-della-terapia-a-campi-elettromagnetici-pulsati-sul-volume-della-prostata/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staff Happy Care]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2018 08:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[documenti scientifici]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.happycare.it/?p=2876</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Effetto della terapia a campi elettromagnetici pulsati sul volume della prostata e vascolarizzazione nel trattamen-to dell&#8217;iperplasia prostatica benigna: uno studio pilota in un modello canino Leoci<span class="excerpt-hellip"> […]</span></p>
<p>L'articolo <a href="https://www.happycare.it/effetto-della-terapia-a-campi-elettromagnetici-pulsati-sul-volume-della-prostata/">Effetto della terapia a campi elettromagnetici pulsati sul volume della prostata</a> proviene da <a href="https://www.happycare.it">Happy Care</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Effetto della terapia a campi elettromagnetici pulsati sul volume della prostata e vascolarizzazione nel trattamen-to dell&#8217;iperplasia prostatica benigna: uno studio pilota in un modello canino</h2>
<h6>Leoci R1, Aiudi G, Silvestre F, Lissner E, Lacalandra GM.</h6>
<h5>SFONDO</h5>
<p>L&#8217;iperplasia prostatica benigna (IPB) è il risultato dell&#8217;invecchiamento urogenitale. Recenti studi suggeriscono che una compromissione senile dell&#8217;afflusso di sangue alle basse vie urinarie gioca un ruolo nello sviluppo dell&#8217;IPB e quindi può essere un fattore che contribuisce alla patogenesi dell&#8217;IPB.</p>
<p>La prostata canina è un modello per comprendere la crescita anor-male della ghiandola prostatica umana.<br />
Abbiamo studiato l&#8217;efficacia della terapia a campi elettromagnetici pulsati (PEMF) nei cani per modificare il flusso sanguigno della prostata e valutato il suo effetto su BPH.</p>
<h5>RISULTATI</h5>
<p>Le 3 settimane di PEMF hanno prodotto una significativa riduzione del volume prostatico (57% medio) senza alcuna interferenza con la qualità dello sperma, i livelli di testosterone o la libido.</p>
<p>I parametri Doppler hanno mostrato una riduzione delle resistenze periferiche e una riduzione progressiva durante lo studio della velocità sistolica del picco, della velocità diastolica terminale, della velocità media, della media e del gradiente di picco del flusso sanguigno nel ramo dorsale dell&#8217;arteria prostatica.<br />
L&#8217;indice di pulsatilità e l&#8217;indice di resistenza non variano significati-vamente nel tempo.</p>
<p>Per lo studio sono stati selezionati 20 cani maschi adulti e sani di età compresa tra 8 e 14 anni (media = 9,5 anni, DS = 1,5 anni), del peso di 13-39 chilogrammi (kg) (media = 23,8 kg, DS = 8,8 kg). Nessun sintomo di malattia prostatica è stato rilevato in cani speri-mentali a parte un ingrandimento prostatico uniforme all&#8217;esplorazione del retto e un aumento del volume prostatico all&#8217;ecografia che suggeriva la diagnosi di BPH semplice [43].</p>
<p>La valutazione citologica mediante biopsia di aspirazione con ago sottile della prostata ha confermato la natura benigna dell&#8217;amplia-mento del volume della prostata [49]. Sono state eseguite anche analisi delle urine e un esame andrologico (inclusi esami di ultrasonografia, qualità dello sperma e valutazione dei liquidi prostatici). I cani selezionati erano tutti di proprietà e non soggetti a cambiamenti nelle abitudini durante lo studio.</p>
<p>Gli esami clinici sono stati effettuati presso la Facoltà di Medicina Veterinaria dell&#8217;Università di Bari Aldo Moro. Le indagini sono state condotte con il consenso dei proprietari in conformità con i Principi per la cura e l&#8217;uso degli animali da ricerca, promulgati dalla Comu-nità europea.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h5>ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC DOCUMENT</h5>
<h2>Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy on<br />
Prostate Volume and Vascularity in the Treatment of<br />
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Pilot Study in a Canine<br />
Model</h2>
<h6>Raffaella Leoci,1,* Giulio Aiudi,1 Fabio Silvestre,1 Elaine Lissner,2 and Giovanni Michele<br />
Lacalandra1</h6>
<h5>BACKGROUND</h5>
<p>Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a result of urogenital aging. Recent<br />
studies suggest that an age-related impairment of the blood supply to the<br />
lower urinary tract plays a role in the development of BPH and thus may<br />
be a contributing factor in the pathogenesis of BPH. The canine prostate is<br />
a model for understanding abnormal growth of the human prostate gland.<br />
We studied the efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) in<br />
dogs to modify prostate blood flow and evaluated its effect on BPH.</p>
<h5>METHODS</h5>
<p>PEMF (5 min, twice a day for 3 weeks) was performed on 20 dogs affected<br />
by BPH. Prostatic volume, Doppler assessment by ultrasonography, libido,<br />
semen quality, testosterone levels, and seminal plasma volume, composition<br />
and pH were evaluated before and after treatment.</p>
<h5>RESULTS</h5>
<p>The 3 weeks of PEMF produced a significant reduction in prostatic volume<br />
(average 57%) without any interference with semen quality, testosterone<br />
levels or libido. Doppler parameters showed a reduction of peripheral<br />
resistances and a progressive reduction throughout the trial of the systolic<br />
peak velocity, end-diastolic velocity, mean velocity, mean, and peak<br />
gradient of the blood flow in the dorsal branch of the prostatic artery. The<br />
pulsatility index and the resistance index did not vary significantly over<br />
time.</p>
<h5>CONCLUSIONS</h5>
<p>The efficacy of PEMF on BPH in dogs, with no side effects, suggests the<br />
suitability of this treatment in humans and supports the hypothesis that impairment<br />
of blood supply to the lower urinary tract may be a causative factor<br />
in the development of BPH. Prostate 74:1132–1141, 2014. © 2014 The<br />
Authors. The Prostate published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.<br />
<b>Keywords</b>: BPH, prostate, electromagnetic therapy, PEMF, dog</p>
<h5>INTRODUCTION</h5>
<p>Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is an age-related enlargement of the<br />
prostate gland and is one of the most frequent medical disorders of elderly<br />
men throughout the world [1]. BPH also has a serious public health impact.<br />
Direct and indirect annual costs related to BPH treatment are estimated<br />
to be $3.9 billion in the United States [2–4] and €858 per patient per<br />
year in Europe [5]. BPH can present with hematuria, lower urinary tract<br />
symptoms and sexual dysfunction. If untreated, BPH leads to reduced quality<br />
of life and may result in severe complications such as acute urinary retention<br />
and urinary tract infections [6,7].</p>
<p>Generally the main goals of therapy for BPH are to improve symptoms,<br />
improve quality of life, arrest the disease process and prevent some of the<br />
adverse outcomes associated with BPH. The goals of BPH therapy may<br />
differ, however, depending on the individual&#8217;s point of view: patients focus<br />
on the quality-of-life issues and alleviation of symptoms and prefer a natural<br />
product with minimal side effects, particularly effects that impair sexual<br />
function or alter ejaculation; primary care physicians are concerned<br />
with safety of treatment used; and insurers and funders of national healthcare<br />
systems seek to minimize and defer treatment costs [8].</p>
<p>At the moment there are no therapies that meet all objectives. The available<br />
therapeutic options are surgical or pharmaceutical, each with pros and<br />
cons. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been the goldstandard<br />
treatment in men with symptomatic BPH. However, the morbidity<br />
of TURP approaches 20%, and less invasive techniques being developed<br />
are reducing the need for this method [9]. Available drug therapies for<br />
BPH fall under two general categories: alpha-blockers and 5 alpha-reductase<br />
inhibitors, both of which can improve urine flow, but they do not reduce<br />
the size of the prostate, and can contribute to sexual dysfunction or<br />
hypotension as side effects.</p>
<p>Phytotherapies or dietary supplements (saw palmetto, pygeum africanum,<br />
etc.) are widely available and commonly used remedies, with evidence of<br />
efficacy, but may not have the quality and safety profiles of medicines<br />
regulated by the Food and Drug Administration and may have variable potency<br />
and pharmacological activity [10].</p>
<p>Each new therapeutic approach should not ignore BPH pathophysiology,<br />
even if not completely understood [11]. BPH is a disease with multiple etiologies,<br />
including hormone signaling, disruption of proliferation, and<br />
apoptosis dynamics, and chronic inflammation, with changes in the morphology<br />
and phenotype of the prostate stroma. Inflammation of the<br />
prostate represents a mechanism for hyperplastic changes to occur in the<br />
prostate. Both chronic and acute inflammation may lead to events that can<br />
cause proliferation within prostatic tissue through oxidative stress. Both<br />
tissue damage and oxidative stress may lead to compensatory cellular proliferation<br />
with resulting hyperplastic growth [12].</p>
<p>Systemic conditions such as hypercholesterolemia [13], obesity [14] and<br />
stress [15,16] may be important risk factors for BPH. Several studies suggested<br />
an association between prostatic disease and the presence of vascular<br />
disorders such as coronary heart disease [17,18] or diabetes mellitus<br />
[19,20]. Generalized or localized vascular damage may cause hypoxia.<br />
Ghafar and colleagues [1] postulated that hyperplasia in the stromal and<br />
glandular compartments of the prostate might be induced by stromal<br />
growth secondary to hypoxia, which in turn results from abnormal blood<br />
flow patterns. In a recent study using a cell-culture model of human prostatic<br />
stromal cells, the cells responded to hypoxia by up-regulating the secretion<br />
of several growth factors in vitro, which suggests that hypoxia<br />
might trigger prostatic growth [21].</p>
<p>These findings led our team to consider a new therapeutic option for BPH:<br />
pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF). We focused our attention on<br />
the following main concepts: (1) the prostatic vascular system is an important<br />
component of prostate growth and regulation, and the dysfunction in<br />
blood flow to the prostate gland may be involved in the process through<br />
which BPH develops and is controlled [1]; (2) inflammation represents a<br />
mechanism for hyperplastic changes to occur in the prostate [12]; and (3)<br />
PEMF has a positive effect on vascularization and hemodynamics of the<br />
prostate [22] and tissues in general [23]. Thus, reducing tissue hypoxia that<br />
results from abnormal blood flow patterns by improving oxygen delivery<br />
and reducing inflammation might be a healing measure or a preventive<br />
measure in patients with or at risk of BPH.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, there is some confusion about PEMF. In general, electromagnetic<br />
modalities include any modality which uses electricity and therefore<br />
generates both an electric field and a magnetic field. This includes<br />
PEMFs, microcurrent therapy (MCT) and microwave diathermy (MWD).<br />
Ultrasound is a commonly used modality in which the resultant acoustic<br />
wave is mechanical and not electromagnetic [24].</p>
<p>Many other energy delivery<br />
system used to treat BPH [including transurethral electrovaporization<br />
of the prostate (TUVP), transurethral electrovapor resection of the<br />
prostate (TUVRP), transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate using<br />
bipolar energy (plasmakinetic vaporization of the prostate [PKVP]), visual<br />
laser ablation of the prostate (VLAP), transurethral microwave thermotherapy<br />
(TUMT)] have been developed as alternatives to surgical<br />
transurethral prostatectomy (TURP) [25].</p>
<p>PEMF is very low frequency pulsed energy waves in the range of 1–50 Hz<br />
and is also identified as a weak non-thermal electromagnetic field [26]<br />
generally used to expedite recovery [24] or to reduce post surgical side effects<br />
[27,28].</p>
<p>It is important to distinguish magnetostatic therapies (with natural stones)<br />
with electromagnetic ones. Magnetostatic therapies are based on the application<br />
of a motionless magnetic field.</p>
<p>Electromagnetic therapies are based on the application of time-varying<br />
magnetic fields, usually generated at low frequencies by an alternating current<br />
passing through a coil [29]. The essential difference with static fields<br />
is that time-varying magnetic fields can generate electric fields with significant<br />
intensity inside the body, and its value may be estimated using physical<br />
laws like the Faraday&#8217;s equation. Magnetostatic fields do not have an<br />
associated electric field and cannot transfer magnetic energy to moving<br />
charged particles, indicating the ineffectiveness of this treatment and explaining<br />
the absence of firm medical evidence in the scientific literature to<br />
support its use [29]. In this article, we use the term magnetotherapy or<br />
PEMF to refer to electromagnetic therapy by PEMF, where there is always<br />
an electrical field that influences the body&#8217;s electrical charges.</p>
<p>Over the past several decades, physicians and scientists have used a rigorous<br />
scientific approach to clinical application of PEMF to treat therapeutically<br />
resistant problems, mainly in the musculoskeletal system. PEMF has<br />
been proven to be clinically safe, and it is well accepted that PEMF provides<br />
a practical non-invasive method for inducing cell and tissue modification<br />
that can correct selected pathological states. Many publications<br />
suggest that exogenous electromagnetic fields can have profound effects<br />
on a large number of biological processes [30–33].</p>
<p>PEMF is a relatively widespread method used in several medical disciplines<br />
such as orthopedics, neurology, and urology [34]. The mechanism for<br />
the advantageous action of the pulsed magnetic field on the living organism<br />
is not quite clear yet, but clinical investigations have revealed a favorable<br />
anti-inflammatory, angioedematous, and analgesic therapeutic effect<br />
[35]. A number of clinical studies suggest that magnetic stimulation can<br />
accelerate the healing process [27,32,33,36]. Its use on the prostate gland<br />
led to a decrease in the number of postoperative complications after TURP<br />
[28] and was found to stimulate prostate glands and improve circulation<br />
[23], having a positive effect on vascularization and hemodynamics of the<br />
prostate [22].</p>
<p>The objective of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy of magnetotherapy<br />
for the treatment of BPH as a conservative therapy with high compliance,<br />
no drug interactions and low cost. As a preliminary study, the dog<br />
was used as experimental model. The dog is considered a reliable animal<br />
model for the study of human BPH [11,37–39] and few differences are noticeable<br />
between the two species in terms of prostatic anatomy [40], histology<br />
[41,42], physiology, BPH pathogenesis [43–45], diagnosis [46] and<br />
symptoms.</p>
<p>The most common clinical sign of BPH in dogs is bloody fluid dripping<br />
from the penis unassociated with urination. Although urethral obstructive<br />
disease occurs in men with BPH, it is extremely rare in dogs [47]. While<br />
blood is frequently observed in semen samples and the volume of ejaculate<br />
is decreased [43], total sperm count and fertility are not affected by BPH in<br />
dogs. However, most cases of BPH in dogs do not evidence clinical signs<br />
despite being viewable on ultrasonography as prostatic volume enlargement.<br />
It is only when the prostate becomes large enough to compress the<br />
colon and interferes with defecation that serious effects result and rectal<br />
tenesmus and constipation may be present [48]. Despite the differences,<br />
there are sufficient similarities between the two species to regard the canine<br />
condition as a useful model for comparison to the human disease<br />
[38,43].<br />
In this study, we evaluated the effect of PEMF on prostate volume, semen<br />
quality, testosterone and hemodynamic changes by ultrasonography.</p>
<h4>MATERIALS AND METHODS</h4>
<h5>Animals</h5>
<p>For the study, 20 mature, healthy male dogs 8 to 14 years of age (mean =<br />
9.5 years, SD = 1.5 years), weighing 13–39 kilograms (kg) (mean = 23.8<br />
kg, SD = 8.8 kg) were selected. No symptoms of prostatic disease were detected<br />
in experimental dogs apart from a uniform prostatic enlargement at<br />
rectal exploration and an increase of prostatic volume at ultrasonography<br />
that suggested diagnosis of simple BPH [43].<br />
Cytological evaluation by fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the prostate<br />
confirmed the benign nature of the prostate volume enlargement [49].<br />
Urinalysis and an andrological examination (including ultrasonography<br />
exams, semen quality, and prostatic fluid evaluation) were also performed.<br />
The selected dogs were all owned and not subjected to changes in habits<br />
during the study.</p>
<p>Clinical exams were performed at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,<br />
University of Bari Aldo Moro. Investigations were conducted with the owners&#8217; consent in accordance with the Principles for the Care and Use of<br />
Research Animals, promulgated by the European Community.</p>
<h5>Experiment</h5>
<p>At day 0 (T0), the prostate gland was scanned by transabdominal ultrasonography<br />
and volume was calculated. Prostatic hemodynamic patterns<br />
were checked by Doppler. Semen collection and blood samples were performed<br />
to check semen quality, seminal plasma volume, and serum testosterone<br />
concentration.<br />
Dogs were then treated two times a day (every 12 hours) with magnetotherapy<br />
for 5 min each session for three weeks. At day 7, 14, and 21 (T1,<br />
T2, T3) the prostatic volume and hemodynamic changes were checked by<br />
ultrasonography.<br />
At day 0 and 21 (T0, T3), semen was evaluated for quality (total sperm<br />
concentration, motility), seminal plasma contents, volume and pH; blood<br />
samples were evaluated for testosterone content. Throughout the trial, the<br />
dogs were under clinical observation.<br />
Magnetotherapy<br />
Magnetotherapy was performed by a physical therapy device (Magcell®<br />
Vetri, Physiomed Elektromedizin AG, Schnaittach, Germany) (Fig. 1).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>L'articolo <a href="https://www.happycare.it/effetto-della-terapia-a-campi-elettromagnetici-pulsati-sul-volume-della-prostata/">Effetto della terapia a campi elettromagnetici pulsati sul volume della prostata</a> proviene da <a href="https://www.happycare.it">Happy Care</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.happycare.it/effetto-della-terapia-a-campi-elettromagnetici-pulsati-sul-volume-della-prostata/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
